On Fri, Jan 19, 2018 at 8:04 PM, Andreas Henriksson <[email protected]> wrote: > In summary there are mainly two cases to consider here. Would be great > to hear from maintainer(s) what their thought is on how to best see > this through. Without further input I'd say a Depends on e2fsprogs > is likely the best solution.
Because of the purpose of the tool, I think a Depends on e2fsprogs is the best way to go. It's not strictly required for all functionality, but there's enough basic stuff that I think the principle of least surprise tells us to go in that direction. Either myself or Lee Garrett will add the Depends in the next upload. -- Harlan Lieberman-Berg ~hlieberman
