Hi, > In a bit of historical context, this "fork" was done between August and > December 2016 because we needed them to drop their OpenSSL dependency because > of the widely known license issues it causes. > There was discussion in https://github.com/haiwen/ccnet/issues/7 and > https://github.com/haiwen/seafile/issues/631 and > https://github.com/haiwen/seafile/issues/666 . > > The very best solution of course would be if the two repos were merged again > so > that we can build ccnet and ccnet-server packages from the same source.
The OpenSSL problems are gone, ccnet and ccnet-server link with OpenSSL. However: - ccnet is licensed under de GPLv2 with OpenSSL exception - ccnet-server is licensed under the AGPLv3 with OpenSSL exception Which means that libccnet is probably dual licensed as the code is present in both repositories. I've asked upstream. Thanks a lot for your comments, Alex
