Hi Michael,
> Yeah, unfortunately, mipsel is not the most stable architecture. I am > not sure what we should do here, we can either agressively retry to > build on mipsel until all tests pass or alternatively ignore test > failures. I don't think it would be easy to just ignore them on mipsel, > so that'd mean we might not catch issues going forward on other arches. > > We do ignore testsuite failures for several other packages, but I think > it is way better to fail on testsuite failures and to diagnose them. In > this case, there's probably just not much to diagnose. > > The final alternative would be to remove the previous mipsel binaries so > the missing build here will not impact chemps2's testing migration. > > If it's not too much trouble, I would suggest to retry the build until it passes? Seb
