On 02/19/2018 08:31 AM, Richard Laager wrote:
> If only for testing, what happens if you omit -u and its value?

then it happily runs.

> I'm not sure why ntp's ntpd wouldn't stop. The code is the same (note
> the exit(-1) call):

yes, i saw that too, yet there must be some difference somewhere else
(which is where i stopped to look at/for it yesterday)

> If ntp's ntpd is printing that error, it should be exiting too.

yes, that confused me too. however, fact is ntp does run (and work)
after that message.

i'll send a recipe on how to reproduce it later today.


Reply via email to