Control: tags -1 + confirmed moreinfo On Sat, 17 Feb 2018 at 23:57:48 +0100, Aurelien Jarno wrote: > flatpak 0.10.3-1 (and version 0.10.4-1 currently in sid) fails to build > with glibc 2.27 (2.27-0experimental0 from experimental)
Did you test 0.10.4-1 unsuccessfully, or is that based on extrapolation from 0.10.3-1? I can confirm that 0.10.3-1 FTBFS in the way you described, but 0.10.4-1 builds OK for me with glibc 2.27-0experimental0. > glibc 2.27 added support for copy_file_range. Unfortunately flatpak, > or rather the included libglnx library, also has such a function to > wrap the corresponding syscall. > > The issue has already been fixed upstream in commit 3e16d4ef with an > update of the libglnx submodule. The corresponding libglnx commit is > 4577dc82. flatpak 0.11.0 has the upstream fix that you described, so this is certainly fixed in experimental. flatpak 0.10.4 has commit 084164a20ad2ea5a02ed7e9a915cb3539a8828ba which is meant to fix copy_file_range detection with the older libglnx submodule: <https://github.com/flatpak/flatpak/pull/1401>. So I believe this should also be fixed in unstable already? Thanks, smcv