On 20/02/18 20:14, Jose Luis Rivero wrote: > Package: release.debian.org > Severity: normal > User: release.debian....@packages.debian.org > Usertags: transition > > Dear release team: > > console-bridge 0.4.0 is now in experimental, we can start the transition > for the existing packages to the archive currently using console-bridge. > The following source packages need to be rebuild: > > ros-actionlib_1.11.12-1 > ros-class-loader_0.3.8-1 > ros-geometry2_0.5.16-1 > ros-rosconsole-bridge_0.5.1-1 > ros-roscpp-core_0.6.7-1 > urdfdom_1.0.0-2 > ros-bond-core_1.8.1-2 > ros-ros-comm_1.13.5+ds1-1 > ros-dynamic-reconfigure_1.5.49-1 > ros-geometry_1.11.9-1 > > I think that in terms of 'ben' lingo, the transition has the following > parameters: > > title = "console-bridge"; > is_affected = .depends ~ "libconsole-bridge0.2v5" | .depends ~ > "libconsole-bridge0.4"; > is_good = .depends ~ "libconsole-bridge0.4"; > is_bad = .depends ~ "libconsole-bridge0.2v5"; > > Please schedule binNMUs for the above mentioned packages on all > architectures.
First you need to upload console-bridge to unstable. Before doing that, have you tested that those packages build fine with the new console-bridge? Cheers, Emilio
