Em 05-03-2018 16:41, Sven Joachim escreveu:
> On 2018-03-05 16:25 -0300, Herbert Fortes wrote:
> 
>> Em 05-03-2018 15:45, Sven Joachim escreveu:
>>> Source: libcdk5
>>> Version: 5.0.20161210-5
>>> Severity: minor
>>> Tags: patch
>>>
>>> One symbol is missing from debian/libcdk5.symbols, leading to a warning
>>> from dpkg-gensymbols seen in the build logs.  According to the CHANGES
>>> file it was added on 2016/11/19, so I have chosen 5.0.20161120 as the
>>> minimal version, as for the other symbols.  See the attached patch.
>>>
>>
>> The .symbols file, to pass on all architectures, should not have all symbols.
> 
> Well, it does not _need_ to have all symbols, unless you pass -c2 or
> higher to dpkg-gensymbols.  But I think -c4 is actually recommended to
> catch any problems that might result in an unexpected ABI change.
> 
>> Just the common symbols for every arch. That's what I learned.
>>
>> Are you saying something different from that? Can you explain a bit more?
> 
> I was referring to the following message from dpkg-gensymbols[1]:
> 
> ,----
> | dpkg-gensymbols: warning: some new symbols appeared in the symbols file: 
> see diff output below
> | dpkg-gensymbols: warning: debian/libcdk5/DEBIAN/symbols doesn't match 
> completely debian/libcdk5.symbols
> | --- debian/libcdk5.symbols (libcdk5_5.0.20161210_hurd-i386)
> | +++ dpkg-gensymbols0_FMk7   2018-01-27 17:37:28.000000000 +0000
> | @@ -306,6 +306,7 @@
> |   positionCDKButton@Base 5.0.20161120
> |   positionCDKObject@Base 5.0.20161120
> |   raiseCDKObject@Base 5.0.20161120
> | + reRegisterCDKObject@Base 5.0.20161210
> |   readFile@Base 5.0.20161120
> |   refreshCDKScreen@Base 5.0.20161120
> |   refreshCDKWindow@Base 5.0.20161120
> `----
> 
> True, I have not checked all architectures, only a couple of them.  But
> I don't think that libcdk5's symbols are arch-dependent at all.
> 


I m really do not know.

I checked the debian/changelog. First I sent the
package to 'experimental' to see the build and then 
to 'unstable'. So I think there was a problem with
one of them, at least.

libcdk5 (5.0.20161204-2) unstable; urgency=low   

* Upload to unstable.  

-- Herbert Parentes Fortes Neto <h...@debian.org>  Fri, 09 Dec 2016 12:39:13 
-0200 

libcdk5 (5.0.20161204-1) experimental; urgency=medium   

* New upstream release.  

-- Herbert Parentes Fortes Neto <h...@debian.org>  Fri, 09 Dec 2016 11:51:17 
-0200 

Reply via email to