Control: tags -1 - wontfix X-Debbugs-CC: en...@scummvm.org El dg 11 de 03 de 2018 a les 00:19 +0800, James 'Ender' Brown va escriure: > Reading the other BTS bug you linked, my understanding of the DFSG (and the > commonly accepted interpretation) > is the same as Ansgar supplied there:
I understand your interpretation now. When you say "it must be permitted for Commercial Use" and DFSG #6 says "it may not restrict the program from being used in a business", I understand a sale is commercial use and use in a business, whereas you consider a sale is only conveyance. From that point of view, your license is DFSG-compliant. However, it is compliant because DFSG #1 renders section 3 ineffective. If you knew it, why does section 3 exist? Please confirm that copyright holders of Flight of the Amazon Queen, Lure of the Temptress, and Drascula were not deceived by section 3.
Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature