Le 09/03/2018 à 03:14, Paul Wise a écrit :
> On Fri, Mar 9, 2018 at 7:37 AM, Alexis Murzeau wrote:
>> I am looking for a sponsor for my package "streamlink" for a new
>> upstream version 0.11.0.
> Uploaded.
> PS: if you would like to upload an official backport, feel free to
> file another RFS for that when it reaches testing.

Thanks :)

About the backport, I'm keeping it in a unofficial repository as there
were not so much downloads. Now that this repository is advertised on
streamlink download page, I might reconsider this choice.

Shouldn't not so much used packages preferably not be backported (to
avoid maintenance costs to other involved parties) ?

If, in any case, unofficial backports are better made official, I can
surely target official backports repository.

Also, why should backports be uploaded after the unstable package enter
testing ?
To ensure there is a clean upgrade path from stable / stable-backport to
testing ?

Alexis Murzeau
PGP: B7E6 0EBB 9293 7B06 BDBC  2787 E7BD 1904 F480 937F

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature

Reply via email to