On Sun, Mar 04, 2018 at 06:12:38PM +0000, Debian Bug Tracking System wrote:
> Date: Sun, 4 Mar 2018 19:06:19 +0100
> From: Sven Hoexter <s...@timegate.de>
> To: Nicholas D Steeves <nstee...@gmail.com>, 891996-d...@bugs.debian.org
> Subject: Re: Bug#891996: RFS: btrfsmaintenance/0.4-1 [I maintain the
>  package]
> User-Agent: Mutt/1.9.3 (2018-01-21)
> Hi Nicholas,
> since I did not see any action by someone else I've just uploaded
> it to unstable. I think folks committed to use btrfs engage with the toolchain
> more then people like me, who's still riding on this boring ext4. ;)
> Sven

Hi Sven,

Thank you for uploading!

I totally understand riding on boring ext4, and it's what I still
recommend for friends, family, and colleagues (especially for laptops)
:-) I wonder if ext4 will gain metadata checksums by default before
XFS gains ext4's reputation for resiliency to powerloss and memory
bitflips?  I hope btrfs soon stabilizes to the point where it can be
recommended as a general purpose default...with a wiki page more along
the lines of "use it, it works" than "here are all the things that
could go wrong, and how to work around them".


Attachment: signature.asc
Description: PGP signature

Reply via email to