> I'm not sure that's entirely appropriate. You can perfectly easily add > some udev rules to urjtag, rather than expecting openocd to solve the > problem for you. It can even be done in a way that means the 2 packages > can co-exist. #852856 is a wishlist bug that essentially says "we do the > same thing, I'd like to take advantage of the work you've already done > rather than maintaining a similar list myself".
In my words: Avoiding duplicate work. My plan: Applying the patches, become stakeholder of openocd package. Working together. Groeten Geert Stappers -- Leven en laten leven