On 13.03.2018 09:38, Emilio Pozuelo Monfort wrote:
> On 03/03/18 10:59, Emilio Pozuelo Monfort wrote:
>> As you can see it's a bunch of packages building with gcc-6 & g++-6. They 
>> probably
>> need new upstream versions that support GCC 7. The only exception is 
>> libpam-script
>> build-depending on libgfortran3 for no apparent good reason. I filed #889876 
>> for that.
> I filed bugs for these:
> https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/pkgreport.cgi?users=debian-...@lists.debian.org;tag=gcc-6-rm
>> As for the GCJ removal, I crafted this list of binary packages. This is 
>> running
>> for sid, so it catches more stuff.
>> Some things here need to be updated to use openjdk or default-jdk, e.g. 
>> kamailio, pdftk, libidn...
>> Other things likely need to be removed since GCJ is no more, e.g. ant-gcj, 
>> ecj-gcj...
> And for these:
> https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/pkgreport.cgi?users=debian-...@lists.debian.org;tag=gcj-rm

Please could you extend the latter with bug reports where
default-jdk/default-jre is going to away altogether because it's provided by
gcj?  Things like db5.3 come to my mind ...


Reply via email to