On Tue, 2018-03-13 at 10:49 +0100, Raphael Hertzog wrote:
> Hi,
> On Mon, 12 Mar 2018, Luca Boccassi wrote:
> > That is certainly the case for myself at $work - we have a lot of
> > scripts to deal with installing&upgrading images, I've tested it,
> > and
> > they all break due to this change. In my case it's a derivative
> > with
> > proprietary bits, so I understand if that is treated as less
> > important.
> > But would it be possible to make this change optional, please?
> Making this change optional would not be logical. It would complexify
> the
> code to support two different layouts when the goal was to simplify
> it.

Ok, makes sense.

> > Or maybe have a backward-compatible symlinks?
> This seems entirely reasonable. Can you work on this?

Yes no problem, I'll give it a shot and send a PR for review before the
end of the week.

> BTW, given your vested interested in the various live tools, would
> you
> like to join the maintenance team?
> Myself I am working on live tools only because I need them for the
> derivative I work on (Kali) and it would be nice to share the
> workload
> with other people.

Certainly, I'm more than happy to help! We use the live tools in our
derivative (Vyatta) so I can dedicate time at work to it.

Kind regards,
Luca Boccassi

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part

Reply via email to