On Tue, 2018-03-13 at 10:49 +0100, Raphael Hertzog wrote: > Hi, > > On Mon, 12 Mar 2018, Luca Boccassi wrote: > > That is certainly the case for myself at $work - we have a lot of > > scripts to deal with installing&upgrading images, I've tested it, > > and > > they all break due to this change. In my case it's a derivative > > with > > proprietary bits, so I understand if that is treated as less > > important. > > But would it be possible to make this change optional, please? > > Making this change optional would not be logical. It would complexify > the > code to support two different layouts when the goal was to simplify > it.
Ok, makes sense. > > Or maybe have a backward-compatible symlinks? > > This seems entirely reasonable. Can you work on this? Yes no problem, I'll give it a shot and send a PR for review before the end of the week. > BTW, given your vested interested in the various live tools, would > you > like to join the maintenance team? > > Myself I am working on live tools only because I need them for the > derivative I work on (Kali) and it would be nice to share the > workload > with other people. Certainly, I'm more than happy to help! We use the live tools in our derivative (Vyatta) so I can dedicate time at work to it. -- Kind regards, Luca Boccassi
Description: This is a digitally signed message part