Package: src:love Version: 0.9.1-4 --
Dear maintainer, at the moment both liblua5.1-0-dev and libluajit-5.1-dev are required to build. I think one or the other exclusively should be enough, and your d/rules specifies one or the other already. The best being to require first libluajit-5.1-dev if available and fallback on liblua5.1-0-dev. This way, love will benefit from luajit's speed if possible but will build on more architectures as well thanks to lua's portability (that should fix the BD-Uninstallable status on some architectures) Here is a patch for this. Also, ppc64el's support in luajit is unsure in the long term, so with the patch, we ensure to be able to still have love on this architecture even if luajit drops ppc64el support (and thus fix the current FTBFS : https://buildd.debian.org/status/fetch.php?pkg=love&arch=ppc64el&ver=0.9.1-4&stamp=1503721727&raw=0 Thanks, Regards. F.
pgp1RSAl5HYy9.pgp
Description: PGP signature
diff -Nru love-0.9.1/debian/control love-0.9.1/debian/control --- love-0.9.1/debian/control 2016-08-03 20:27:34.000000000 +0000 +++ love-0.9.1/debian/control 2016-08-03 20:37:52.000000000 +0000 @@ -17,8 +17,7 @@ libflac++-dev, libflac-dev, libfreetype6-dev, - liblua5.1-0-dev, - libluajit-5.1-dev [!hurd-i386 !kfreebsd-amd64 !s390x], + libluajit-5.1-dev [!hurd-i386 !kfreebsd-amd64 !s390x] | liblua5.1-0-dev, libmodplug-dev, libmpg123-dev, libogg-dev,
pgpE49kREfaNN.pgp
Description: PGP signature
