On Fri, Mar 16, 2018 at 8:25 AM, Shengjing Zhu <i...@zhsj.me> wrote: > On Fri, Mar 16, 2018 at 2:35 PM, László Böszörményi (GCS) > <g...@debian.org> wrote: >> On Fri, Mar 16, 2018 at 7:01 AM, Shengjing Zhu <i...@zhsj.me> wrote: >>> Could you use linux-any in Architectures field? >> I couldn't find it now, but as I remember RocksDB is 64 bit only. I >> can check i386 (that I've locally), but I wonder how it will work. Do >> you have any experience with 32 bit builds? > Hi, I didn't build it before. Recently I'm working on packaging ceph > on Debian[1]. > Previously ceph bundled rocksdb which I think it's a serious policy > bug, but it built on many architectures[2][3]. It was me who packaged Ceph at the first place. :) One of the major reasons I've packaged RocksDB was that Ceph embedded it and that's a serious policy violation like you already mentioned.
> Actually I'm testing the building on PPA[4], and it failed on 32 bits. > But It seems some compiler warning(treated as error), I'm still > working on it. Please note that Ceph builds the static libraries of RocksDB only. While it builds, I've doubts if it really can handle 64 bit data of RocksDB on x32 architectures. Can you try Ceph on x32 architectures with RocksDB bits used? I don't follow Ceph anymore and I don't know what RocksDB used for in it. Regards, Laszlo/GCS
