> > Some recent change in unstable makes arch-test FTBFS: > > > This might be a regression somewhere in the MinGW packages, > > maintainer is Cc'ed.
> Thanks for the report, this is indeed a recent regression in binutils > (2.29.1-10 works, 2.29.1-13 doesn’t). On the other hand, taking Stretch's version of binutils-mingw-w64 and building it against current binutils (2.30-11) is free of this regression. The resulting package is 2.30-11+7.4. Meow! -- ᛊᚨᚾᛁᛏᚣ᛫ᛁᛊ᛫ᚠᛟᚱ᛫ᚦᛖ᛫ᚹᛖᚨᚲ
