Hi, Am 02.04.2018 um 12:57 schrieb Julien Cristau: > On Thu, Mar 15, 2018 at 14:51:10 +0100, Philipp Huebner wrote: >> I would like to fix #883987 in boost1.62 for Stretch. >> The changes are basically the same as what is currently in testing and I got >> the >> maintainer's go-ahead in >> http://lists.alioth.debian.org/pipermail/pkg-boost-devel/2018-March/004184.html >> > What made these partial specializations not be necessary anymore? That > seems like critical missing information if we are to make a decision > here, to know if/what we might be breaking instead.
my guess is that only upstream can really answer that. My work colleague confirmed that we're basically using the same code as in the example at the upstream bug tracker and it fails when using gcc-6 on Stretch: https://svn.boost.org/trac10/ticket/12534 Best wishes, -- .''`. Philipp Huebner <debala...@debian.org> : :' : pgp fp: 6719 25C5 B8CD E74A 5225 3DF9 E5CA 8C49 25E4 205F `. `'` `-
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
