[Resending including 853...@bugs.debian.org in CC this time..]

Hi Graham,

Thanks for the followup.

> Chris, you wrote "...the test would still be unreliable whatever value
> you choose", can you propose something other than increasing the
> timeout?

Well, just to be 100% clear, I don't propose increasing the timeout at
all: I'm pretty hardcode on tests being determinstic so merely increasing
the wait time feels especially gross to me. :)

So, indeed, another solution is really required but alas I'm really not
familiar with this particular test nor this package in general so I would
not be able to comment with any authority.

Have you tried speaking to upstream?

Best wishes,

     : :'  :     Chris Lamb
     `. `'`      la...@debian.org / chris-lamb.co.uk

Reply via email to