On 2018-04-08 00:25 +0200, Axel Beckert wrote:

> Sven Joachim wrote:
>> Your package declares compliance with Debian Policy 4.1.4, claiming that
>> "no other changes were required", but this is not actually true.
> [...]
>> |    If "/etc/staff-group-for-usr-local" does not exist, "/usr/local"
> Good catch! And thanks for the patch, too!
> I though wonder: Do I need a b-d on debhelper >= 11.2~ then?
> Because I'd otherwise won't fulfil S-V 4.1.4, or is this pointless,
> because soon, even stretch-bpo will have 11.2~… and there won't be any
> earlier 11.… debhelper anywhere in Debian.

I would not bother with that then.  Until debhelper >= 11.2~ is
available in stretch-bpo, a possible backporter would have to lower the
Build-Depends anyway, and the resulting small inaccuracy in
Standards-Version does not really affect users.


Reply via email to