On 2018-04-08 00:25 +0200, Axel Beckert wrote: > Sven Joachim wrote: >> Your package declares compliance with Debian Policy 4.1.4, claiming that >> "no other changes were required", but this is not actually true. > [...] >> | If "/etc/staff-group-for-usr-local" does not exist, "/usr/local" > > Good catch! And thanks for the patch, too! > > I though wonder: Do I need a b-d on debhelper >= 11.2~ then? > > Because I'd otherwise won't fulfil S-V 4.1.4, or is this pointless, > because soon, even stretch-bpo will have 11.2~… and there won't be any > earlier 11.… debhelper anywhere in Debian.
I would not bother with that then. Until debhelper >= 11.2~ is available in stretch-bpo, a possible backporter would have to lower the Build-Depends anyway, and the resulting small inaccuracy in Standards-Version does not really affect users. Cheers, Sven