Ack, go ahead with NMU. I'll look into moving cyrus-sasl2 to salsa.d.o in the near future.
Ondrej -- Ondřej Surý <[email protected]> On Fri, Apr 20, 2018, at 17:04, Roberto C. Sánchez wrote: > Hi Karsten, > > On Fri, Apr 20, 2018 at 04:51:04PM +0200, Karsten Merker wrote: > > > > - Judging from https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=799864, > > the package changelog and the lack of activity on the > > pkg-cyrus-sasl2-debian-devel mailinglist, you appear to be the > > only remaining person in the cyrus-sasl2 packaging team. > > > > - You have marked all your packages as "Low-Threshold-NMU" at > > https://wiki.debian.org/LowThresholdNmu. > > > > - The patch from bug #894297 is largely noninvasive as it doesn't > > touch the actual cyrus-sasl2 codebase, only has any effect > > at all if a build-profile is explicitly enabled during building > > the package and uses the existing DEB_BUILD_OPTIONS-based > > infrastructure in debian/rules. > > > For what it is worth, I still consider myself a member of the team. I > agree that cyrus-sasl2 is in need of a great deal of attention. This > semester at school has been very busy, though it is almost over. It will > probably be at least a few weeks before things calm down enough for me > to devote a sufficiently large block of time/effort to cyrus-sasl2 > maintenance. > > As far as I am concerned, I welcome your NMU, so please go ahead with > it. > > Regards, > > -Roberto > -- > Roberto C. Sánchez > > _______________________________________________ > Pkg-cyrus-sasl2-debian-devel mailing list > [email protected] > https://alioth-lists.debian.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-cyrus-sasl2-debian-devel
