We should probably decide what the cutoff point should be, since it
looks like 1.39 will be a database change from 1.38.
Now, I myself would really like 1.39 since it implements pool
migration, which is important to my installation. However, I think
1.38.2 is really the bottom edge of what would be really useful,
since with that level you get VSS support and Mac OS X HFS+ support.
Storage encryption, which is somewhere in between 1.38.2 and 1.39, is
also probably of great interest to the casual user (now if the
backpack containing your DVD-ROM backup is swiped, the thief didn't
get all your personal data!). So the 1.38.3 port underway would be a
VAST improvement over 1.36.2.
I'm happy to beta-test and to do test builds on both i386 and s390
machines (and yes, there is a demand, from me and my company at
least, for an s390 package).
I would second the sentiment that static linking, while it might be
nice, is much less necessary than simply having a modern Bacula
available on Debian. I don't mind a couple versions with too many
dependencies while we get it figured out, if I get to exploit VSS
support.
I'm happy to help in whatever way I can.
Adam
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
