intrigeri a écrit le 28/05/2018 à 09:42 :
> Hi!
> 
> Gilles Filippini:
>> Then I give up :/ Considering the very low popcon I think I'd rather ask for
>> a removal.
> 
> Can we please hold on a little bit on this removal?

No problem.

> SikuliX is critical to Tails' CI and I've just learned about this
> removal request (we had been discussing some of the issues for a month
> on #897215 but I failed to notice this very request). So I'd like
> a little bit of time to assess the situation and decide what we're
> going to do about it.
> 
> Would it be OK with you to let the package be auto-removed from
> testing (due to #897215) and leave it in sid for a few more weeks, or
> ideally months?
> 
>> I've just given a try at packaging release 1.1.2 and, after adding yet
>> another couple of patches, it builds fine but is completely broken at
>> runtime.  I've tested version 1.1.1 currently in unstable and testing and
>> it is broken as well, probably because of the migration to Wayland.
> 
> Could you please push this preliminary work somewhere? It would help
> us (Tails) evaluate how hard it would be to fix these problems and
> then make a decision about our future course of action :)

Sure. Everything should be on the salsa repo:
  [email protected]:java-team/sikuli

Feel free to ping me in case you need more info.

Regards,

_g.

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature

Reply via email to