On Tue, 2018-05-29 at 13:11 -0400, Nicholas D Steeves wrote: > On Mon, May 28, 2018 at 07:46:59PM +0200, Jakub Wilk wrote: > > * Paride Legovini <p...@ninthfloor.org>, 2018-05-28, 17:33: > > > spm is a single fully POSIX shell compliant script > > [...] > > > In Debian the script will be installed as 'spm.sh' > > > > That would be against Policy §10.4. > > Please talk to upstream about choosing a different name. > > Are there any reasons why a debian/spm.install like this one wouldn't > be an appropriate solution to §10.4? > > #!/usr/bin/dh-exec > spm.sh => /usr/bin/spm
/usr/bin/spm is already shipped by another package as noted in the initial report. Renaming the binary to simple-password-manager or so would probably work. Ansgar