On Sat, 14 Oct 2017 Sean Whitton wrote: > On Sat, Oct 14 2017, Mattia Rizzolo wrote: > > On Sat, Oct 14, 2017 at 11:15:10AM -0700, Sean Whitton wrote: > >> +maintainer's control. The specification should entail that the > >> +architecture-independent packages are buildable on at least two > >> +architectures.
[...] > > Also, I dislike the sentence in itself, I believe it should be more > > straightforward in conveying its meaning of "pretty please at least > > two arch". > > It has to be that way for cases like this: > > Build-Indep-architecture: !amd64 > > That entails that it builds on at least two architectures, but on a > common reading of 'specify', it does not specify two archs. How about "You should not specify that the packages are buildable on only one architecture."? -- Jess Hall