El jueves, 14 de junio de 2018 20:42:21 -03 none escribió: > Hello, > > >> If you refuse to fix it for Qt4, please fix it for Qt5 ! > > > > - With respect to static libraries: we refuse for any version of Qt :-) > > But, why ? Why make such exception ?
https://wiki.debian.org/StaticLinking#Downsides So non static libraries. > > - With respect cross compiling: you should *really* try with Qt5. It > > rocks. > > Well, at least it has abeen a pleasure for the projects I keep so far > > > > :-) > > No, because of porting, it doesn't. But that time, that's on my side. > Though please note that no Bitcoin forks got ported to qt5 in general, > ever (not Bitcoin core itself, not Litecoin, not Peercoin. among more > than 5000 cryptocurrencies they all use qt4 when the gui feature is > available). Well, they better do the switch, there will be no Qt4 in the near future. > Qt5 still rely heavily on /proc/cpuinfo for building which returns the > wrong architecture (hence the problem above). I have never heard this, please enlighten me :-) > I have no reason to port > to qt5 If we get to it, no more Qt4 in Debian buster. Worst case scenario: Buster+1. Really, Qt4 has been dead upstream since literally years. -- __________________________________ < ¿Nunca viste a una vaca hablar? > ---------------------------------- \ ^__^ \ (oo)\_______ (__)\ )\/\ ||----w | || || Lisandro Damián Nicanor Pérez Meyer http://perezmeyer.com.ar/ http://perezmeyer.blogspot.com/
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
