Package: ept Severity: wishlist Hi. I was looking for adept to enter testing to try it, wondering how it would compare to synaptic. After hitting a few bugs, I came to wonder about the unusually low number of bug reports on it, before reading the package description.
I appreciate that the software's quality is indicated in the description, but I doubt that it's enough to make it suitable for release. Getting in stable means adept will take archive space, space on CDs, get security support, etc. All this seems a lot for alpha software which has alternatives. I think adept should be removed from testing. I don't know if it makes sense to keep it in unstable but not in testing, so maybe it should only be in experimental. I have considered mailing the maintainers about this but sent a bug report instead. You may tag it wontfix or just close it if you disagree. -- System Information: Debian Release: testing/unstable APT prefers testing APT policy: (990, 'testing'), (500, 'unstable') Architecture: i386 (i686) Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash Kernel: Linux 2.6.15-1-686 Locale: LANG=fr_CA.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=fr_CA.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
