On Mon, 9 Jul 2018 at 19:38 Simon McVittie <[email protected]> wrote: > If we want pidof to be provided by a new procps-base instead of > sysvinit-utils for buster, maybe now is the time to start uploading > packages with that change to experimental? > I'd say if it is going to happen, it should happen now.
> This appears to have been fixed before procps 3.3.12 (which is in stretch) > if I'm reading changelogs correctly? > This was the revert of the namespace problem? - Craig -- Craig Small https://dropbear.xyz/ csmall at : dropbear.xyz Debian GNU/Linux https://www.debian.org/ csmall at : debian.org Mastodon: @[email protected] Twitter: @smallsees GPG fingerprint: 5D2F B320 B825 D939 04D2 0519 3938 F96B DF50 FEA5
