Hi tony, Am 10.07.2018 um 05:22 schrieb tony mancill: [...] > I'm in favor of dropping the -java-doc packages completely and instead > using our time and effort to improve the state of our runtime libraries, > toolchain and application packages. (It would be a different story if > we were developing a distribution for Java developers who don't have > ready access to other sources of documentation, but I have a hard time > imagining that our users would prefer javadocs over functioning and > secure libraries.) > >> Well, now we have to convince doku to implement this solution, or at >> least to accept it, without closing the bug report again. Volunteers? > > Hmm... I choose to believe that the bug (we're talking about , > right?) was mass-closed along with everything else that was open against > src:openjdk-9. It seems like a reasonable and very "Debian" approach to > avoid embedding an available system library. If we really want javadoc, > we could resubmit (preferably with a patch).
Description: OpenPGP digital signature