On Wed, Jul 11, 2018 at 06:33:45PM +0100, Ian Jackson wrote: > > Do you think it would be (easily) possible to have the test dir saved to > > the artifacts only in case of failures? > > Yes, but it wouldn't be a good idea in general. And I have a handle > on this bug.
why wouldn't it? I believe storing extra info on failure is a sane
thing to do in general, that has the potential to help out also in
future failures.
> > Otherwise, I'd just commit the thing mentioned in the other mail (dch -D
> > vs dch -r) and see whatever happens on the next regular upload.
>
> I think I understand a lot more about what's going on now, after
> reading debchange's source code. It's a bit of a mess, though.
debchange's code is kind of alive, it grew in a somwhat akward
environment :) (assuming the "mess" refers to dch!)
--
regards,
Mattia Rizzolo
GPG Key: 66AE 2B4A FCCF 3F52 DA18 4D18 4B04 3FCD B944 4540 .''`.
more about me: https://mapreri.org : :' :
Launchpad user: https://launchpad.net/~mapreri `. `'`
Debian QA page: https://qa.debian.org/developer.php?login=mattia `-
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
