Hi Raphael,
Raphael Hertzog wrote:
> > From my point of view this means that either another BinNMU was
> > necessary since the previous BinNMU, but was not yet triggered, or
> > something else is broken in the package.
>
> Yeah, a new binutils got uploaded multiple times in the last days.
*sigh*
> For now I requested a bin-nmu in #904073.
Thanks!
So we can close the bug once wcc is installable again, or shall we
retitle it again to FTBFS + tag unreproducible? (Sorry for the
potential retitle mess I might have caused. In retroperspective, two
separate bug reports would have been better, but I realised only late
that one bug wasn't just a follow up issue of the other.)
Matthias Klose wrote:
> that happens when you package pre-releases ... anyway you can link statically
> to
> avoid these issues.
That'd be against an IIRC rather strong policy recommendation.
Regards, Axel
--
,''`. | Axel Beckert <a...@debian.org>, https://people.debian.org/~abe/
: :' : | Debian Developer, ftp.ch.debian.org Admin
`. `' | 4096R: 2517 B724 C5F6 CA99 5329 6E61 2FF9 CD59 6126 16B5
`- | 1024D: F067 EA27 26B9 C3FC 1486 202E C09E 1D89 9593 0EDE
