Hi, Clément Hermann wrote: > On 03/08/2018 04:23, Sean Whitton wrote: > > On Thu 02 Aug 2018 at 12:16PM +0800, Clément Hermann wrote:
>>> "as verbose as reasonably possible" seems incompatible with "maximally >>> verbose >>> output", at least in some cases (golang packages come to mind). >>> >>> Would it be possible to clarify this ? >> >> Yes. Let's improve this. >> >> Would s/maximally// be sufficient? Or s/maximally/more/ ? > > IMO, s/maximally// would definitely fix the most pressing matter here, > that is, the fact that we have incompatible statements. I would > definitely be able to declare the go packages I maintain compliant, for > instance. > > However, regarding the rest of the discussion on this bug, I agree more > guidance to the maintainer as to what is expected would be nice. But > that is a separate issue, I think. Ah, thanks! Sorry to have misunderstood. I don't believe s/maximally// changes the normative content --- it just more clearly expresses what it already is saying. So I think a policy editor can make that change without waiting for seconds. Anyway, just in case, seconded. Thanks, Jonathan