Control: tags -1 - moreinfo + upstream
Control: forwarded -1 https://github.com/libfuse/sshfs/issues/109

On 2016-08-25 16:31:26 +0200, Louis-David Mitterrand wrote:
> In order to save an attachement on a sshfs mount with mutt I have to
> use "sshfs -odisable_hardlink"

Concerning Mutt, the problem will probably be avoided soon:

  https://gitlab.com/muttmua/mutt/issues/61

In short, the check of the stat structures (which contain the inode
number, in particular, which leads to the error) is probably useless.

But personally, I think that "sshfs -odisable_hardlink" is a safer
solution in general, until hard links are properly implemented in
sshfs.

-- 
Vincent Lefèvre <[email protected]> - Web: <https://www.vinc17.net/>
100% accessible validated (X)HTML - Blog: <https://www.vinc17.net/blog/>
Work: CR INRIA - computer arithmetic / AriC project (LIP, ENS-Lyon)

Reply via email to