Hi Helge,
> However, I can live with both versions, so if it is too late
> to fix lintian than so be it.
I wouldn't say it was too late, more that it has not been raised before
and it would require somewhat of a big reworking of the logic so would
be difficult to see this being prioritised.
It would also mean your package is ipso facto different from others
which — as a general rule — is not a great idea.
> I personally like to have the licenses listed first, as the reader
> than has a clear view of what he is expecting, before getting the
> details.
(Curiously, I completely agree with your reasoning but would disagree
with the idea that the license blocks are the "non-detail" part.)
Regards,
--
,''`.
: :' : Chris Lamb
`. `'` la...@debian.org / chris-lamb.co.uk
`-
