On Sun, Aug 26, 2018 at 11:57 AM Paul Gevers <[email protected]> wrote: > On 26-08-18 04:33, Paul Hardy wrote: > > I can suggest additional text as a patch here, re-opening the bug (I > > didn't want to do that before). Then you can accept or reject the > > text I suggest, and close the bug again. > > If you feel more happy with that, please do (please retitle the bug if > you do). Third option is to use your text as starting point and amend it > before acceptance. > ... > Please, don't wait too long. Just update it. If there is stuff wrong > we'll fix it.
I'll submit something next weekend. > And just a note about adding autopkgtest to your packages, > you are aware that you can test it on our infrastructure from > experimental? Yes, I had thought of doing that. I was just trying to increase the chance of the next upload's CI testing succeeding with minimal trial-and-error. (My three Autotools-based packages are already passing CI testing, but the way I did things seemed clumsy and I want to simplify things as much as possible.) Thanks, Paul Hardy
