Control: forwarded -1 https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/BATIK-1239
On Wed, Aug 29, 2018 at 08:23:38PM +0200, Markus Koschany wrote: > > Wouldn't it help more if I simply try to package batik-constants? > > I thought it would be more likely to get a more precise answer from them > because they certainly know their code best. I am not even sure if > batik-constants is a long term solution or if they want to change that > again in the future. Depending on the cgview code it may have been > possible to patch the sources and make them compatible with Batik 1.10 > without packaging batik-constants. If this all sounds too far-fetched, > then packaging batik-constants is the way to go. Thanks for your insight. I have opened an upstream bug report[1] (no idea how to contact upstream otherwise). Kind regards Andreas. [1] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/BATIK-1239 -- http://fam-tille.de