Hi Mark, > It's a regular testing system, but yeah, partially updated. Maybe it's a
Ah, that explains it. > library it bumps the >= in the dependency, but in this case the > unversioned depends on libxapian30 meant the upgrade didn't get pulled > in. I see the point about complicating backports though, especially if > xapian's upstream isn't carefully versioning its symbols. The problem I see is that during build even an old version can be used, and during run time a version at least as new as the version it was compiled against. But AFAIS this cannot be expressed in debian/control, and I would prefer not introducing a strict dependency. Are you fine with closing this bug? Thanks Norbert -- PREINING Norbert http://www.preining.info Accelia Inc. + JAIST + TeX Live + Debian Developer GPG: 0x860CDC13 fp: F7D8 A928 26E3 16A1 9FA0 ACF0 6CAC A448 860C DC13
