On Monday 03 September 2018 01:15:28 Adam Borowski wrote: > On Sun, Sep 02, 2018 at 11:37:43PM +0200, Pali Rohár wrote: > > On Sunday 02 September 2018 21:33:03 Debian Bug Tracking System wrote: > > > Nitpick: these warnings are trivial to fix: > > > W: udfclient source: dep5-copyright-license-name-not-unique bsd-2-clause > > > (paragraph at line 37) > > > W: udfclient source: dep5-copyright-license-name-not-unique bsd-2-clause > > > (paragraph at line 62) > > > W: udfclient source: dep5-copyright-license-name-not-unique bsd-4-clause > > > (paragraph at line 149) > > > so it'd be nice if you could get rid of them in the future. Not an > > > important thing, but less noise is good. > > > > How to fix this problem? There are basically 3 different texts of BSD > > licenses in source files. > > You need to give them unique names. If the body of a license is different, > so must be its short name. > > Yeah, that's somewhat unpleasant, but the reason is obvious.
Ok. So which short names should I use? I used "bsd-*-clause" name as described in table at: https://www.debian.org/doc/packaging-manuals/copyright-format/1.0/#license-short-name -- Pali Rohár pali.ro...@gmail.com
