Hi!
On Tue, 31 Jul 2018 14:00:12 -0400 =?UTF-8?Q?St=C3=A9phane_Graber?= <stgra...@ubuntu.com> wrote: > On Tue, Jul 31, 2018 at 10:10 AM Free Ekanayaka <fr...@debian.org> wrote: > > > > Hey, > > > > I would think that Stéphane will want to backport these changes to the > > 3.0.x series, as they improve performance considereably. It wouldn't be > > a big change for the LXD code itself, since this is mostly "backend" > > code. > > Yes, we will be backporting the switch to the new dqlite > implementation in the 3.0.x branch, should be in 3.0.2. > And I see it's indeed the case. Thanks! Now the only issue in Debian context is that dqlite depends on a patched sqlite3... It there any plan to upstream those patches ? Or at least treating that as a proper fork, with a different name ? The former would be better. of course, but the later could at least make sure we can package it separately (with conflicts/provides dance)... And the later is a way to wait until patches are approved upstream. As I see LXD packaging in Ubuntu is now replaced by snaps [1], I guess it's not really necessary for Canonical, but that would really help the packaging effort in Debian and other distros. [1] https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/lxd/+bug/1788040 Cheers, -- nodens