Hi, On Mon, 06 Aug 2018 at 13:09:13 +0200, Jonas Meurer wrote: > Am 23.07.2018 um 14:42 schrieb Chris Lamb: > Still, if we would split the gnupg smartcard keyscript into an own > binary package, we would have to do the same for decrypt_gnupg, > decrypt_opensc and decrypt_ssl. Which would mean four new binary > packages.
More, if were to further split the initramfs integration. For instance in the case of OpenPGP smartcards, pinentry-gtk (the default pinentry flavor) will suffice for the normal system, but pinentry-curses | pinentry-tty is required for unlocking to work at early boot stage. Tight dependencies are great, but is it really worth it for a package with just a dozen of lines of shell code and 10× as much meta-data? Cheers, -- Guilhem.
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
