Control: tags -1 + moreinfo

Ian Jackson writes ("Re: Bug#906317: dgit: consider demoting git-buildpackage 
to recommends"):
> So I'm inclined to think that the subset of dgit's functionality which
> is useable without gbp pq is too small for your use case (and too
> small to make it sensible to demote this depends).  But I'm happy to
> talk about it some more.
...
> What is the concern with git-buildpackage ?  I understand that it's a
> big piece of software but it contains many important tools for
> managing many styles of Debian packaging git branch.  I wasn't aware
> that it had significant functionality of a kind that would be
> undesirable on a porterbox.

Regards,
Ian.

Reply via email to