[2018-10-05 17:30] Emilio Pozuelo Monfort <po...@debian.org> > On 04/10/2018 03:40, kact...@gnu.org wrote: > > > > [2018-10-02 09:38] Emilio Pozuelo Monfort <po...@debian.org> > >> part text/plain 567 > >> On 11/08/2018 09:40, Dmitry Bogatov wrote: > >>> Package: release.debian.org > >>> Severity: normal > >>> User: release.debian....@packages.debian.org > >>> Usertags: transition > >>> > >>> Hello. According to [1] I request approval of upload gdbm-1.17 into > >>> unstable. It will affect 28 packages, 26 of which build cleanly > >>> (no-changes source upload will be required) and I am ready to NMU > >>> patches for two others (perl and qsf). > > > >> Is perl still unfixed? With the upcoming perl transition, that's > >> something th at I wouldn't like to see fixed through an NMU at this > >> point. > > > > No, according to #904005, Perl maintainer fixed this issue himself. > > Only qsf left {no response from maintainer, will NMU}. > > Let's do this now.
Uploaded to unstable. binNMU is automatic, correct?