Package: nautilus-python Version: 1.2.2-1 Control: block 910491 with -1 Hi all,
As discussed on IRC: 11:39 < georg> Hi all, thanks for the upload of nautilus-python 1.2.2-1. It still builds against python2, which currently blocks #910491, as that needs python3 11:39 -zwiebelbot:#debian-gnome- Debian#910491: mat2: Please package the Nautilus extension - https://bugs.debian.org/910491 11:39 < georg> Any plan to build against python3 as well? 11:39 < georg> or in addition to, and ship python3-nautilus? 12:41 < jbicha> georg: python-nautilus has a lot of reverse dependencies. Someone would need to test which ones work with python3 and which don't 12:41 < jbicha> and the package would need to be split 12:42 < jbicha> and it looks like there is a single pkgconfig file so that's "interesting" 12:42 < jbicha> anyway, I'm not working on it :) 12:58 < georg> jbicha: thanks a lot! should we track progress in a bug against nautilus-python, or is it fine as is for the time being? 12:59 < jbicha> please open a bug 13:12 < georg> jbicha: sorry, I read "anyway, I'm working on it", that's why I asked.. I'll open a bug report 13:13 < jbicha> yeah, no one's working on it. :( 13:14 < jbicha> I eventually fixed bug 907591 but it wasn't precise enough :| 13:15 < georg> wouldn't it be possible to introduce python3-nautilus (while still shipping python-nautilus), and without checking all the rdepends 13:15 < georg> so, leaving the rdepends as is, and new packages could depend on python3-nautilus 13:16 < jbicha> you still have the pkgconfig issue and you still probably need to split the documentation out of python-nautilus 13:16 < jbicha> but feel free to open a merge request if you think you have something that works 13:17 < jbicha> https://salsa.debian.org/gnome-team/nautilus-python 13:17 < georg> alright Thanks for your work, cheers, Georg
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
