Chris Lamb wrote:
> > Yep, still there are messages on this (2.52b-4, just let the dh helper
> > run over the docs package):
>
> So, why you `-Nafl-doc` instead of letting it print the warning
> messages…?
>
> Or, rather, are we corrupting the .png file here...? If not, we can
> just silence this warning to close this issue, no? We can't trust
> this header anyway...
Gentle ping on this?
As I mention, we are detecting this case, so the only real fix
would be to not print such warnings or this is not a bug in the
first place.
Regards,
--
,''`.
: :' : Chris Lamb
`. `'` [email protected] / chris-lamb.co.uk
`-
