On Tue, Nov 6, 2018 at 10:07 AM Mattia Rizzolo <[email protected]> wrote: > > Remember that the submitter are not subscribed to bugs, so if you want > to mail me you need to put me amongs the recipients. > > On Mon, Nov 05, 2018 at 05:31:27PM +0000, Dimitri John Ledkov wrote: > > I don't believe this is serious at all. > > Santiago already answered this part. > > > Are you working on testing python3.8 or some such and noticed lack of > > compat? > > I'm working on the python3.7-supported transition, and noticed that > boost1.62 didn't pick up py3.7 despite the rebuilds. And while looking > at the rules file I noticed the buggy for loops. You may wish to fix > that thing (I didn't really looked further, as 1.67 is fine in this > regard, and the boost transition should happen soon).
that's correct. boost1.62 doesn't support 3.7, nor does boost1.65.1. So no, you are not going to get python3.7 in boost1.62. But the upcoming boost1.67 does. We should have started migration to boost1.67 three months ago, but it's not yet started. Please see debian release bug https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=904316 for the boost 1.67 transition. -- Regards, Dimitri.
