Hi Mattia, Mattia Rizzolo wrote: > > JFTR: I see quite some issues like this, but no transition hints in > > neither the PTS nor the Package Tracker. And there was also no > > announcement on d-d-a like for the (compared to this very smooth) Perl > > transition. (If I would have seen a hint on a such a transition, I > > wouldn't have filed that bug report.) Is this an uncoordinated > > transition? > > It's coordinated, it started 3 days ago, but since then pochu have yet > to trigger the rebuilds...
IIRC pochu also did parts (if not most) of the near-perfect Perl 5.28 transition I was refering, too. > https://release.debian.org/transitions/html/python3.7-default.html Oh, ok, then sorry for the noise. Maybe there's an issue with propagating the transitions to or displaying them in the PTS and Package Tracker then? For sigil, there's only a QtBase and a hunspell transition listed in both, PTS and Package Tracker. Regards, Axel -- ,''`. | Axel Beckert <a...@debian.org>, https://people.debian.org/~abe/ : :' : | Debian Developer, ftp.ch.debian.org Admin `. `' | 4096R: 2517 B724 C5F6 CA99 5329 6E61 2FF9 CD59 6126 16B5 `- | 1024D: F067 EA27 26B9 C3FC 1486 202E C09E 1D89 9593 0EDE
