On Mar 14, martin f krafft <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > also sprach Marco d'Itri <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2006.03.14.2021 +0100]: > > > Why? It does nicely with busybox-cvs-static. udev can't deal with > > > it. > > busybox-cvs-static providing a broken shell could be a good reason. > How is the shell broken? You experienced "how". And if something breaks a script which works with bash, dash and a modern busybox then it fits pretty well my definiton of brokeness.
> > > > Or maybe this should just be reassigned to busybox-cvs-static. > > > ... which is deprecated anyway, it seems. > > More than deprecated, apparenly it's not part of Debian anymore. > 700 http://debian.ethz.ch stable/main Packages Indeed, it's not in testing nor in unstable. -- ciao, Marco
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
