Hi Andreas! On 22:13 Thu 06 Dec , Andreas Henriksson wrote: > I agree that fixing these merged-usr reproducability issues on their > own > is pretty useless, not only for ganeti but for all affected packages. > Still I'm attaching a patch that makes ganeti reproducible in > merged-usr vs non-merged systems. I think it would be great if > you could still consider applying it (and then continuing the discussion > upstream about general improvements), because it would be nice to see > people stop discussing this useless change. Local builds will break > for so many other reasons than merged-usr..... fixing the things > people complain about could still be nice though, just to avoid > further discussions.
Agreed. Unfortunately, the patch is malformed, it only contains the following two lines: > ganeti_2.16.0-2.1.dsc > ganeti_2.16.0-2.dsc Could you resend it? Thanks! Apollon
