Hi Andreas,

the reverse dependency HH-suite failed to compile with the ffindex version Debian shipped.

I have no feelings about it. It should just work :)  The HH-suite is about structure prediction from sequence homology, which I found we should continue to offer in our distribution https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/HH-suite https://tracker.debian.org/pkg/hhsuite . Are there other reverse dependencies for ffindex in our distribution?

Priority is the HH-suite. Then ffindex. If difficulties surface anywhere then we have initiate some head scratching / banging. If there is nothing happening somewhere that I don't know about then I would leave it as it is.

Cheers,

Steffen

On 19.12.18 09:53, Andreas Tille wrote:
Hi,

after reading https://github.com/soedinglab/ffindex_soedinglab/issues/4
I came to the conclusion that we somehow picked the wrong fork of
ffindex.  For me it seems very probable that if we pick the old codebase
bug #907624 which was introduced when choosing this will vanish if we
revert to the previously packaged code base.  I have a local commit
which is doing this:


diff --git a/debian/changelog b/debian/changelog
index 6a26115..c409f4f 100644
--- a/debian/changelog
+++ b/debian/changelog
@@ -1,3 +1,12 @@
+ffindex (0.9.9.7+sog+git20160415.14274c9-1) UNRELEASED; urgency=medium
+
+  * The previous location on Github was an improperly choosen fork
+    (see https://github.com/soedinglab/ffindex_soedinglab/issues/4)
+    Here the version is now named "0.9.9.7+sog" (Saved On Github)
+    to make it alphabethically later than the previous one.
+
+ -- Andreas Tille <ti...@debian.org>  Wed, 19 Dec 2018 09:16:09 +0100
+
  ffindex (0.9.9.7+soedinglab+git20180802.74550c8-1) unstable; urgency=medium
* Fix watch file (version should actually be +git20171201.74550c8 but
diff --git a/debian/watch b/debian/watch
index 91b4f38..b47f123 100644
--- a/debian/watch
+++ b/debian/watch
@@ -1,4 +1,4 @@
  version=4
-opts="mode=git,pretty=0.9.9.7+soedinglab+git%cd.%h" \
-    https://github.com/soedinglab/ffindex_soedinglab.git HEAD
+opts="mode=git,pretty=0.9.9.7+sog+git%cd.%h" \
+    https://github.com/ahcm/ffindex.git HEAD



Upstream at github.com/ahcm/ffindex was extremely quick to tag a
release and so it is at least active.

Steffen, was your pick intentional or did you just stumbled by chance
over the other fork?  Are you OK with reverting to the old code?

Kind regards

       Andreas.

PS: I reported the segfault issue to the according fork anyway
     https://github.com/soedinglab/ffindex_soedinglab/issues/7



Reply via email to