Package: src:node-websocket
Version: 1.0.23-3.1
Severity: serious
Tags: ftbfs

Dear maintainer:

I tried to build this package in buster but it failed:

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
[...]
 debian/rules build-indep
dh build-indep --with nodejs
   dh_update_autotools_config -i
   dh_auto_configure -i
   debian/rules override_dh_auto_build-indep
make[1]: Entering directory '/<<PKGBUILDDIR>>'
dh_auto_build
        make -j1
make[2]: Entering directory '/<<PKGBUILDDIR>>'
node-gyp configure build
gyp info it worked if it ends with ok
gyp info using node-gyp@3.8.0
gyp info using node@8.11.2 | linux | x64
gyp info spawn /usr/bin/python2

[... snipped ...]

               
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
../src/bufferutil.cc:104:7: note: here
       case 2: *((unsigned char*)to+1) = *((unsigned char*)from+1) ^ 
*((unsigned char*)mask+1);
       ^~~~
../src/bufferutil.cc:104:39: warning: this statement may fall through 
[-Wimplicit-fallthrough=]
       case 2: *((unsigned char*)to+1) = *((unsigned char*)from+1) ^ 
*((unsigned char*)mask+1);
               
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
../src/bufferutil.cc:105:7: note: here
       case 1: *((unsigned char*)to  ) = *((unsigned char*)from  ) ^ 
*((unsigned char*)mask);
       ^~~~
../src/bufferutil.cc: In static member function 'static 
Nan::NAN_METHOD_RETURN_TYPE BufferUtil::Unmask(Nan::NAN_METHOD_ARGS_TYPE)':
../src/bufferutil.cc:78:41: warning: this statement may fall through 
[-Wimplicit-fallthrough=]
       case 3: *((unsigned char*)from+2) = *((unsigned char*)from+2) ^ 
((unsigned char*)mask)[2];
               
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
../src/bufferutil.cc:79:7: note: here
       case 2: *((unsigned char*)from+1) = *((unsigned char*)from+1) ^ 
((unsigned char*)mask)[1];
       ^~~~
../src/bufferutil.cc:79:41: warning: this statement may fall through 
[-Wimplicit-fallthrough=]
       case 2: *((unsigned char*)from+1) = *((unsigned char*)from+1) ^ 
((unsigned char*)mask)[1];
               
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
../src/bufferutil.cc:80:7: note: here
       case 1: *((unsigned char*)from  ) = *((unsigned char*)from  ) ^ 
((unsigned char*)mask)[0];
       ^~~~
  SOLINK_MODULE(target) Release/obj.target/bufferutil.node
/usr/bin/ld: cannot find -lnode
collect2: error: ld returned 1 exit status
make[3]: *** [bufferutil.target.mk:131: Release/obj.target/bufferutil.node] 
Error 1
make[3]: Leaving directory '/<<PKGBUILDDIR>>/build'
gyp ERR! build error 
gyp ERR! stack Error: `make` failed with exit code: 2
gyp ERR! stack     at ChildProcess.onExit 
(/usr/share/node-gyp/lib/build.js:262:23)
gyp ERR! stack     at emitTwo (events.js:126:13)
gyp ERR! stack     at ChildProcess.emit (events.js:214:7)
gyp ERR! stack     at Process.ChildProcess._handle.onexit 
(internal/child_process.js:198:12)
gyp ERR! System Linux 4.9.0-8-amd64
gyp ERR! command "/usr/bin/node" "/usr/bin/node-gyp" "configure" "build"
gyp ERR! cwd /<<PKGBUILDDIR>>
gyp ERR! node -v v8.11.2
gyp ERR! node-gyp -v v3.8.0
gyp ERR! not ok 
make[2]: *** [Makefile:2: all] Error 1
make[2]: Leaving directory '/<<PKGBUILDDIR>>'
dh_auto_build: make -j1 returned exit code 2
make[1]: *** [debian/rules:44: override_dh_auto_build-indep] Error 2
make[1]: Leaving directory '/<<PKGBUILDDIR>>'
make: *** [debian/rules:14: build-indep] Error 2
dpkg-buildpackage: error: debian/rules build-indep subprocess returned exit 
status 2
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

The build was made in my autobuilder with "dpkg-buildpackage -A"
but it also fails here:

https://tests.reproducible-builds.org/debian/rb-pkg/unstable/amd64/node-websocket.html

where you can get a full build log if you need it.

If this is really a bug in one of the build-depends, please use reassign and 
affects,
so that this is still visible in the BTS web page for this package.

Thanks.

Reply via email to