Gürkan Myczko: > Hi Niels, > >> Thanks for providing an updated package. :) >> >> Are you (still?) interested in becoming the maintainer of bchunk? If >> so, please lets file an "Intend To Salvage" bug, so you can become the >> proper maintainer of this package. :) > > Is Intend to Salvage possible keeping the old maintainer? (as making a > team of two(or more)), by > just adding oneself to the package as I already did? Since I do use > bchunk (both > for converting bin/cue to iso, and ripping audio from bin/cue), I guess > I can as well (co-)maintain it. >
We can keep them by simply not removing them from the package (but it would be wise mention that we intend to keep them as Uploader/Maintainer in the original ITS mail). >> I am happy to sponsor your upload with some minor changes once we get >> there. Alternatively, if you are not interested in maintaining bchunk, >> then I will simply do a one-off NMU bchunck based on your changes and >> adding a few of my own on top. :) > > So you can add yourself too :) > > Best, > >> Thanks, >> ~Niels I probably won't add myself as I do not use bchunk. I am here because I noted bchunk does not successfully cross-build but it has a trivial patch for it. That is my goal (plus add a "Rules-Requires-Root: binary-targets" while we are add it). However, if I can help you along the way with improving bchunk, then I am happy to do that. :) Thanks, ~Niels
